|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT
COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
MIAMI DIVISION
|
CASE NO.:
07-22204-CIV-GOLD/TURNOFF
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHARLES O. MORGAN, JR., AS
PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF
THE ESTATE OF FREDERICK J.
KUNEN,
Defendant.
|
CASE NO.
07-23167-GOLD/TURNOFF
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
TERRY E.
PROVENCE and
DT CAPITAL LLC,
|
On August 23, 2007, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission")
filed a Complaint in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida (the "District
Court"), commencing the above (left) captioned civil
injunctive and enforcement action against Charles O.
Morgan, Jr., as the Personal Representative of the
Probate Estate of Frederick J. Kunen, who passed away on
July 11, 2007, in St. Maarten, Netherlands Antilles (the
"Kunen Action"). The Commission sought, among other
things, an asset freeze over Mr. Kunen's Estate to
prevent dissipation of any assets derived from Mr.
Kunen's fraudulent options trading scheme. The
Complaint alleged that from approximately December 2006
until Mr. Kunen died on July 11, 2007, Mr. Kunen lured
primarily inexperienced investors into a risky options
trading program by falsely representing the program had
a successful ten-year track record, and baselessly
promising 10 to 20 percent monthly returns. In reality,
Mr. Kunen spent investor funds on a variety of personal
expenses, and lost a significant amount of the remainder
of their money in his risky options trading.
The District Court granted
the Commission's request for an asset freeze over the
Estate after finding the Commission had made a prima
facie showing that Kunen had violated the securities
laws, and that property of the Estate may have been the
proceeds of the fraudulent scheme. The Court also
granted the Commission's motion to appoint a receiver
over the Estate, appointing Scott M. Dimond, Esq. (the
"Receiver").
On December 6, 2007, the
Commission filed another Complaint in the District Court
commencing the above (right) captioned civil injunctive
and enforcement action against Terry E. Provence and DT
Capital LLC (the "Provence Action"). As in the Kunen
Action, the Commission sought an asset freeze over the
assets of Mr. Provence and DT Capital LLC to prevent
dissipation of any assets derived from the fraudulent
options trading fraud that Mr. Provence, through DT
Capital LLC and other entities, had conducted
simultaneously and parallel with the fraud perpetrated
by Mr. Kunen, and that Mr. Provence continued after Mr.
Kunen's death. Mr. Provence's fraud was nearly
identical to Mr. Kunen's fraud in form, the
misrepresentations made, the type of investors targeted,
and the misappropriation, conversion or loss of investor
funds. Indeed, like Mr. Kunen, Mr. Provence
misappropriated or converted the funds that he received
from investors to his own use, or lost the funds in
risky index options trades.
The District Court granted
the Commission's request for an asset freeze over the
assets of Mr. Provence and DT Capital. Subsequently, in
light of the similarity and interconnectedness of the
Kunen fraud and the Provence fraud, the Commission
requested that the Court consolidate the two actions
into one action. After the Court consolidated the two
actions, the Commission sought to have the Receivership
over the assets of Mr. Kunen's estate expanded to
include the assets of DT Capital LLC.
Since the commencement of
the Kunen Action and the Provence Action, the Receiver,
the Commission, and the Personal Representative of Mr.
Kunen's Estate have worked cooperatively to discover,
marshal and preserve funds and assets derived from
investors whom Mr. Kunen and/or Mr. Provence deceived
into providing money by means of their
misrepresentations and baseless, misleading
projections. The Receiver, the Commission, and the
Personal Representative also have either contacted or
received contact from numerous investors in Mr. Kunen's
and Mr. Provence's fraudulent options trading programs.
As a result of those discovery efforts, it now appears
more than 100 investors of Mr. Kunen and nearly 60
investors of Mr. Provence may have a claim on the funds
and assets that the Receiver has marshaled in connection
with Mr. Kunen's and Mr. Provence's fraudulent schemes.
To preserve these funds and assets for the benefit of
the investors who were defrauded by Mr. Kunen or Mr.
Provence, the Receiver and the Commissions sought to
have the Court impose a constructive trust over the
assets and funds that were derived from investors and
marshaled by the Receiver. The District Court granted
this relief and imposed a constructive trust over those
assets and funds.
This website was created
to provide information to all investors defrauded by Mr.
Kunen or Mr. Provence regarding the efforts of the
Receiver, the Commission and the Personal Representative
of Mr. Kunen's Estate to discover, marshal and preserve
for the benefit of all investors the funds and assets of
the Receivership Estates of Mr. Kunen and DT Capital
LLC. As this website will be updated frequently with
Court filings, status reports and other materials, we
encourage all investors to visit frequently. In the
event any investor concern is unclear or not addressed
in this website, please contact the Receiver or his
counsel using the contact information provided herein.
|